Develop Quality Management System Documentation In ISO 9000 Standards

Develop Quality Management System Documentation In ISO 9000 Standards

ISO 9000 Standards – Document Approval

ISO 9000 Standards – Document Approval

The ISO 9000 Standards requires that documents be approved for adequacy prior to issue.

Approval prior to issue means that designated authorities have agreed the document before being made available for use. Whilst the term ade-
quacy is a little vague it should be taken as meaning that the document is judged as fit for the intended purpose. In a paper based system, this means approval before the document is distributed. With an electronic system, it means that the documents should be approved before they are published or made available to the user community.

The ISO 9000 Standards document control process needs to define the process by which documents are approved. In some cases it may not be necessary for anyone other than the approval authority to examine the documents. In others it may be necessary to set up a panel of reviewers to solicit their comments before approval is given.
It all depends on whether the approval authority has all the information
needed to make the decision and is therefore ‘competent’. One might think that the CEO could approve any document in the organization but just because a person is the most senior executive does not mean he or she is competent to perform any role in the organization.

Users should be the prime participants in the approval process so that the
resultant documents reflect their needs and are fit for the intended purpose. If the objective is stated in the document, does it fulfil that objective? If it is stated that the document applies to certain equipment, area or activity, does it cover that equipment, area or activity to the depth expected of such a document? One of the difficulties in soliciting comments to documents is that you will gather comment on what you have written but not on what you have omitted. A useful method is to ensure that the procedures requiring the document specify the acceptance criteria so that the reviewers and approvers can check the document against an agreed standard.

To demonstrate documents have been deemed as adequate prior to issue,
you will need to show that the document has been processed through the
prescribed document approval process. Where there is a review panel, a simple method is to employ a standard comment sheet on which reviewers can indicate their comments or signify that they have no comment. During the drafting process you may undertake several revisions. You may feel it
necessary to retain these in case of dispute later, but you are not required to do so. You also need to show that the current issue has been reviewed so your comment sheets need to indicate document issue status.

Identifying and Recording Design Changes In ISO 9000 Standards

Identifying and Recording Design Changes In ISO 9000 Standards

The documentation for design changes in ISO 9000 Standards should comprise the change proposal, the results of the evaluation, the instructions for change and traceability in the changed documents to the source and nature of the change. You will therefore need:
- A Change Request form which contains the reason for change and the results of the evaluation – this is used to initiate the change and obtain approval before being implemented.
- A Change Notice that provides instructions defining what has to be changed this is issued following approval of the change as instructions to the owners of the various documents that are affected by the change.
- A Change Record that describes what has been changed – this usually forms part of the document that has been changed and can be either in the form of a box at the side of the sheet (as with drawings) or in the form of a table on a separate sheet (as with specifications).
Where the evaluation of the change requires further design work and possibly experimentation and testing, the results for such activities should be documented to form part of the change documentation.
At each design review a design baseline should be established which identifies the design documentation that has been approved. The baseline should be recorded and change control procedures employed to deal with any changes. These change procedures should provide a means for formally requesting or proposing changes to the design. For complex designs you may prefer to separate proposals from instructions and have one form for proposing design changes and another form for promulgating design changes after approval. You will need a central registry to collect all proposed changes and provide a means for screening those that are not suitable to go before the review board, (either because they duplicate proposals already made or because they may not satisfy certain acceptance criteria which you have prescribed). On receipt, the change proposals should be identified with a unique number that can be used on all related documentation that is subsequently produced. The change proposal needs to:
- Identify the product of which the design is to be changed
- State the nature of the proposed change identify the principal requirements, specifications, drawings or other design documents which are affected by the change
- State the reasons for the change either directly or by reference to failure reports, nonconformity reports, customer requests or other sources
- Provide for the results of the evaluation, review and decision to be recorded

Documents That Ensure Effective Planning, Operation And Control

Documents That Ensure Effective Planning, Operation And Control

The ISO 9000 standard requires management system documentation to include documents required by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.
The documents required for effective planning, operation and control of the processes would include several different types of documents. Some will be
product and process specific and others will be common to all processes. Rather than stipulate the documents that are needed, ISO 9000 Standards now provides for the organization to decide what it needs for the effective operation and control of its processes. This phrase is the key to determining the documents that are needed.
There are three types of controlled documents, namely:
- Policies and practices (these include process descriptions, control procedures, guides, operating procedures and internal standards)
- Documents derived from these policies and practices, such as drawings,
specifications, plans, work instructions, technical procedures and reports
- External documents referenced in either of the above
There will always be exceptions to this model but in general the majority of
documents used in a management system can be classified in this way.
Derived documents are those that are derived by executing processes;
for example, audit reports result from using the audit process, drawings result from using the design process, procurement specifications result from using the procurement process. There are, however, two types of derived document:
prescriptive and descriptive documents. Prescriptive documents are those that prescribe requirements, instructions, guidance etc. and may be subject to change. They have issue status and approval status, and are implemented in doing work. Descriptive documents result from doing work and are not
implemented. They may have issue and approval status. Specifications, plans, purchase orders, drawings are all prescriptive whereas audit reports, test reports, inspection records are all descriptive. This distinction is only necessary because the controls required will be different for each class of documents.

Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards

Evaluation of Compliance In ISO 14001 Standards

The requirement to establish a procedure for periodically evaluating compliance with applicable legal and other requirements falls short of specifically requiring regulatory compliance audits but, in fact, a system of regular regulatory compliance audits may be the most practical means for meeting this requirement of the standard. In the U.S., determination of whether to conduct a compliance audit will be governed in part by the particular jurisdiction’s approach to allowing a legal privilege for the self-assessment audit.

Evaluation vs. Audit – The difference between an evaluation and audit can only be determined by looking outside of ISO 14001. Consulting a dictionary reveals that an evaluation involves a determination of value or worth and that an audit is an examination of accounts done by persons appointed for the purpose. A better definition `is the more specific ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing, which defines an audit as a “systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.” Many organizations do not have a system for evaluating regulatory compliance other than their own records and the inspections of regulatory officials. This lack of a verification system can be a risky way to operate. Reports of enforcement actions and consent agreements show that many organizations are blindsided by rogue employees who violate rules and falsify documents to cover up environmental misdeeds. Although ISO 14001 does not prescribe a specific approach to evaluation of regulatory compliance, organizations should consider methods for going beyond verification of records by collecting and evaluating physical evidence.

Operational Control In ISO 14001 Standards

Operational Control In ISO 14001 Standards

Operational Controls over Significant Environmental Aspect Activities, ?4.4.6.a&b – ISO 14001requires the organization to identify and plan the operations associated with its identified significant environmental aspects in order to establish documented operational control procedures that preclude deviation from the Environmental Policy or not achieving objectives and targets.

Opportunities to apply operational controls can be found by reviewing operations. As shown in the accompanying text box, once the operations that can produce significant impacts are identified, it is a relatively simple step to establish operational control procedures that are consistent with the aims of the Environmental Policy and the objectives and targets and that stipulate operating criteria.

Significant Environmental Aspects of Goods and Services, §4.4.6.c – This requirement of ISO 14001 requires careful reading. Here is a parsed interpretation of the Operational Control requirement as it relates to goods and services furnished by others:

“The organization shall identify those operations that are associated with [its] identified significant environmental aspects… The organization shall plan these operations in order to ensure that they are carried out under specified conditions by… [1] establishing and maintaining procedures related to the identifiable significant environmental aspects of goods and services used by the organization and [2] communicating relevant procedures and requirements to suppliers and contractors.”

An easy way to conform to this requirement is to:

1. Identify the operations associated with the significant environmental aspects;

2. Identify the environmental aspects of goods and services furnished by others;

3. Determine how these aspects contribute to the organization’s significant aspect operations;

4. Establish appropriate/relevant requirements for the providers of these services; and

5. Communicate the requirements to suppliers and contractors.

Confusion in conforming to this requirement can arise because it is easy to read sub-clause c) independently of the first sentence of §4.4.6.

This first sentence gives context to the rest of the section in that it requires that we first “identify those operations… associated with the identified significant environmental aspects.” Once we have identified these operations, we look to the significant aspects of goods and services supplied by others and assess their contribution to the potential environmental impact. The accompanying example is offered to help clarify the intent of the requirement.

ISO 9000 Standards Video

ISO 9000 Standards Video Clip

Free ISO 9000 Standards E-Books

Subscribe For ISO 9000 E-Book

• Name
• Email

• 3 subscribers

GetResponse Email Marketing

Demonstrating conformity with ISO 9001:2008

Demonstrating conformity with ISO 9001:2008
For organizations wishing to demonstrate conformity with the requirements of ISO 9001:2008, for the purposes of certification/registration, contractual, or other reasons, it is important to remember the need to provide evidence of the effective implementation of the QMS.
Organizations may be able to demonstrate conformity without the need for extensive documentation.
To claim conformity with ISO 9001:2008, the organization has to be able to provide objective evidence of the effectiveness of its processes and its quality management system. Clause 3.8.1 of ISO 9000:2005 defines “objective
evidence” as “data supporting the existence or variety of something” and notes that “objective evidence may be obtained through observation, measurement, test, or other means.”
Objective evidence does not necessarily depend on the existence of documented procedures, records or other documents, except where specifically mentioned in ISO 9001:2008. In some cases, (for example, in clause 7.1(d)
Planning of product realization, and clause 8.2.4 Monitoring and measurement of product), it is up to the organization to determine what records are necessary in order to provide this objective evidence.
Where the organization has no specific internal procedure for a particular activity, and this is not required by the standard, (for example, clause 5.6 Management Review), it is acceptable for this activity to be conducted using as a basis the relevant clause of ISO 9001:2008. In these situations, both internal and external audits may use the text of ISO 9001:2008 for conformity assessment purposes.

Guidance on Clause 4.2 of ISO 9001:2008

Guidance on Clause 4.2 of ISO 9001:2008
The following comments are intended to assist users of ISO 9001:2008 in understanding the intent of the general documentation requirements of the International Standard.
a) Documented statements of a quality policy and objectives:
Requirements for the quality policy are defined in clause 5.3 of ISO 9001:2008. The documented quality policy has to be controlled according to the requirements of clause 4.2.3.
Note: Organizations that are revising their quality policy for the first time, or in order to meet the amended requirements in ISO 9001:2008, should pay particular attention to clause 4.2.3 (c), (d) and (g).
Requirements for quality objectives are defined in clause 5.4.1 of ISO 9001:2008. These documented quality objectives are also subject to the document control requirements of clause 4.2.3.
b) Quality Manual:
Clause 4.2.2 of ISO 9001:2008 specifies the minimum content for a quality manual. The format and structure of the manual is a decision for each organization, and will depend on the organization’s size, culture and complexity. Some organizations may choose to use the quality manual for other purposes besides that of simply documenting the QMS
A small organization may find it appropriate to include the description of its entire QMS within a single manual, including all the documented procedures required by the standard.
Large, multi-national organizations may need several manuals at the global, national or regional level, and a more complex hierarchy of documentation.
The quality manual is a document that has to be controlled in accordance with the requirements of clause 4.2.3.
c) Documented procedures:
ISO 9001:2008 specifically requires the organization to have “documented procedures” for the following six activities:
4.2.3 Control of documents
4.2.4 Control of records
8.2.2 Internal audit
8.3 Control of nonconforming product
8.5.2 Corrective action
8.5.3 Preventive action
These documented procedures have to be controlled in accordance with the requirements of clause 4.2.3 Some organizations may find it convenient to combine the procedure for several activities into a single documented procedure (for example, corrective action and preventive action). Others may choose to document a given activity by using more than one documented procedure (for example, internal audits). Both are acceptable.
Some organizations (particularly larger organizations, or those with more complex processes) may require additional documented procedures (particularly those relating to product realization processes) to implement an effective QMS.
Other organizations may require additional procedures, but the size and/or culture of the organization could enable these to be effectively implemented without necessarily being documented. However, in order to demonstrate compliance with ISO 9001:2008, the organization has to be able to provide objective evidence (not necessarily documented) that its QMS has been effectively implemented.
d) Documents needed by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes:
In order for an organization to demonstrate the effective implementation of its QMS, it may be necessary to develop documents other than documented procedures. However, the only documents specifically mentioned in ISO 9001:2008 are:
- Quality policy (clause 4.2.1.a)
- Quality objectives (clause 4.2.1.a)
- Quality manual (clause 4.2.1.b)
There are several requirements of ISO 9001:2008 where an organization could add value to its QMS and demonstrate conformity by the preparation of other documents, even though the standard does not specifically require them. Examples
may include:
- Process maps, process flow charts and/or process descriptions
- Organization charts
- Specifications
- Work and/or test instructions
- Documents containing internal communications
- Production schedules
- Approved supplier lists
- Test and inspection plans
- Quality plans
All such documents have to be controlled in accordance with the requirements of clause 4.2.3 and/or 4.2.4, as applicable
e) Records:
Examples of records specifically required by ISO 9001:2008 are presented in Annex B.
Organizations are free to develop other records that may be needed to demonstrate conformity of their processes, products and quality management system.
Requirements for the control of records are different from those for other documents, and all records have to be controlled according to those of clause 4.2.4 of ISO 9001:2008.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING ISO 9001 IN SMEs

KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING ISO 9001 IN SMEs
There are many issues that must be addressed in moving the QMS from the initial state to the desired state. For example, all organizations implementing ISO 9001 will need to consider the unique culture within the organization, its size, and the resources available. Beyond those widely discussed points, three issues that merit particular attention are (1) consideration of the QMS as a parallel function, (2) training, and (3) auditing. Key points associated with these issues are discussed below.
Consideration of QMS as Parallel Function
In the case of all of the transitions depicted, real benefits from the QMS are more likely to be experienced if the QMS is implemented directly into the core structure of the organization. SMEs must be cautious against establishing a QMS that is run separately in parallel to its other systems. In SMEs, the parallel subsystem most commonly exhibits itself as a separate Quality Assurance, or in some cases, ISO 9001 department. Possible reasons for this may include the existence of rigid departmental boundaries in some SMEs or overemphasis on core activities. As Yauch and Steudel [10] note, SMEs tend to focus their attention on “…necessary routine activities (such as sales, production, shipping, etc.) rather than activities aimed at improving processes or systems.” If a SME insists on establishing a separate quality department, its level of effectiveness can be increased by embedding the QMS in widely-used organizational systems where practical. The integration is largely a function of how well the QMS manages to share information with other subsystems and its ability to align with the policies, norms, goals, and values in place throughout the organization.
Training
In SMEs, training and staff development is more likely to be ad hoc and small scale because of modest human and financial resources and the absence of a specific training budget. To prevent the problems arising from lack of education and training, two things must be done:
1. Education of Top Management: The centralization of decision-making processes within many SMEs means that the management can either be the main stumbling block to change or the main catalyst for change. Therefore, any approach to ISO 9001 implementation must involve considerable education for the top management of the organization to create awareness and understanding of the implementation process as a change initiative. Implementing a fully functional and documented QMS requires motivation by top management to appreciate, achieve, and implement the necessary measures to meet the standards’ criteria.
2. Education and Training of Employees: SMEs are often under pressure to quickly gain ISO 9001 registration. Meeting the requirements of the standard in a short period of time can prove a formidable obstacle for a small company. Since most SMEs do not possess the needed expertise internally, they may be inclined to hire external experts to provide the necessary technical expertise and manpower. However, having a functioning and documented QMS requires more than that. It requires ensuring that all employees in the organization clearly know what is expected of them and how they can contribute to the attainment of their organizations’ goals. This will likely require the preparation and implementation of a training plan tailored specifically to the unique characteristics and maturity level of the SME.
Auditing
As emphasized throughout the paper, a QMS is not going to produce the expected results unless it is fully functional. While auditing must therefore verify the existence of the necessary documentation, it must also focus on the functionality of the QMS. The measurement of the functionality and the qualitative and financial impacts of a QMS have been the subject of several studies, including Kaynak [11]. Among the categories used to measure functionality and performance improvement, two are particularly noteworthy for our purposes: management commitment and employee involvement. A QMS cannot be functional in the absence of those two characteristics. Therefore, as a minimum, internal and external auditors should continually verify top management’s commitment to increased company-wide quality awareness and improvement in addition to employee involvement in the design, implementation, operation, and improvement of quality related processes and procedures.

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR ISO 9001:2008

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR ISO 9001:2008
This Implementation Guidance has been developed to assist users in understanding the issues that need to be considered during the co-existence period between ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9001:2008.
While the changes between ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9001:2008 are expected to have a limited impact on users, some arrangements regarding implementation are needed.
Note: To reflect the limited scope of the changes the term “implementation” is now being used to make a clear distinction with the former “transition” from ISO 9001:1994 to ISO 9001:2000, when there were significant changes throughout the standard.
A wide diffusion of this implementation guidance is recommended, in particular the comparison table between ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 9001:2000, given in Annex B to ISO 9001:2008.
ISO 9001:2008 has been developed in order to introduce clarifications to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 and to improve compatibility with ISO 14001:2004. ISO 9001:2008 does not introduce additional requirements nor does it change the intent of the ISO 9001:2000 standard.
Certification to ISO 9001:2008 is not an “upgrade”, and organizations that are certified to ISO 9001:2000 should be afforded the same status as those who have already received a new certificate to ISO 9001:2008 No new requirements were introduced in this edition but, in order to benefit from the clarifications of ISO 9001:2008, users of the former version will need to take into consideration whether the clarifications introduced have an impact on their current interpretation of ISO 9001:2000, as changes may be necessary to their QMS In order to assist organizations to have a full understanding of the new ISO 9001:2008, it may be useful to have an insight on the revision process, how this revision reflects the inputs received from users of the standard, and the consideration given to benefits and impacts during its development.
Prior to the commencement of a revision (or amendment) to a management system standard, ISO/Guide 72:2001 Guidelines for the justification and development of management system standards recommends that a “Justification Study” is prepared to present a case for the proposed project and that it outlines details of the data and inputs used to support its arguments. In relation to the development of ISO 9001:2008 user needs were identified from the following:
- the results of a formal “Systematic Review” on ISO 9001:2000 that was performed by the members of ISO/TC 176/SC2 during 2003-2004
- feedback from the ISO/TC 176/Working Group on “Interpretations”
- the results of an extensive worldwide “User Feedback Survey on ISO 9001 and ISO 9004″ by ISO/TC 176/SC 2/WG 18 and similar national surveys.
The Justification Study identified the need for an amendment, provided that the impact on users would be limited and that changes would only be introduced when there were clear benefits to users.
The key focuses of the ISO 9001:2008 amendment were to enhance the clarity of ISO 9001:2000 and to enhance its compatibility with ISO14001:2004.
A tool for assessing the impacts versus benefits for proposed changes was created to assist the drafters of the amendment in deciding which changes should be included, and to assist in the verification of drafts against the identified user needs. The following decision making principles were applied:
1) No changes with high impact would be incorporated into the standard;
2) Changes with medium impact would only be incorporated when they provided a correspondingly medium or high benefit to users of the standard;
3) Even where a change was low impact, it had to be justified by the benefits it delivered to users, before being incorporated.
The changes incorporated in this ISO 9001:2008 edition were classified in terms of impact into the following categories:
- No changes or minimum changes on user documents, including records
- No changes or minimum changes to existing processes of the organization
- No additional training required or minimal training required
- No effects on current certifications
The benefits identified for the ISO 9001:2008 edition fall into the following categories:
- Provides clarity
- Increases compatibility with ISO 14001.
- Maintains consistency with ISO 9000 family of standards.
- Improves translatability.

Hidden Businees Opportunities

The ISO 9001:2000 Standard has been revised after eight years. And the buzz is rapidly reaching a crescendo. We continue to receive numerous emails and phone calls regarding the impact of the new release. First, let me dispel any anxiety about the November 15, 2008 official “2008” release. There are no new requirements. The changes are largely interpretive, and focus on terminology clarifications. The changes to the ISO 9001 amendment, however, will have considerable benefit.As a back drop, keep in mind that ISO 9001 is not just an International Standard for a Quality Management System. It is the world’s most recognized business management standard. And it makes a strong business case. It focuses attention on leadership, business planning, organizational business processes, your customers (internal and external), measurement and reporting, and continual improvement. That translates to improved business results and a sustainable competitive advantage.
Overview of the Changes
The points of clarification focus on outsourcing, documentation, management representative, employee competence, design verification and validation, process monitoring, control of nonconforming product and corrective and preventive action. But bear in mind, no “shalls” (requirements) were added or removed.Examples of select changes include: In an attempt to clarify the term “outsourcing,” notes were added that require the organization to identify processes (and the control of these) to be completed by an external party. With respect to documentation, the changes focus on improving the compatibility between ISO 9001 and ISO 14001.The only significant addition to the management representative sub clause was to require that the MR be a member of the organization’s management team. This means a contracted person could serve in this role as long as he or she is also considered part of management. The management representative does not have to be full-time.With regard to competence of employees, a note was added to make training more pervasive throughout the organization. Training applies to all employees directly or indirectly responsible for delivering a service or producing a product (everyone that is part of the quality chain). A complete listing of changes can be found in Annex B (Table B.1) of the Standard. Also, note that there is better alignment with ISO 14001:2004.
Comments

Scope Of The Quality Management System

Scope Of The Quality Management System
The ISO 9001 standard requires the quality manual to include the scope of the quality management system including details of justification for any exclusion. The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.
Under ISO 9001:2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because it operated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the quality management system.
It is sensible to describe the scope of the quality management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the quality management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor. Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical to justify inclusions.
The scope of the quality management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.
It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’.
It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable.
For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.

ISO 14001 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

ISO 14001 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
The intent of an environmental policy is to state the organization’s commitment to continuous improvement in environmental performance. A strong, clear environmental policy can serve as both a starting point for developing the EMS and a reference point for maintaining continuous improvement.The policy should be evaluated regularly and modified, as necessary, to reflect changing environmental priorities.The policy should function in two ways: (1) within the company, the policy should focus attention on environmental issues associated with company activities, products, and services; and (2) outside the company, the policy is a public commitment to addressing environmental issues and continuously improving environmental performance.The environmental policy must address:• Commitment to compliance with relevant environmental legislation andregulations• Pollution prevention• Continuous improvement
Tips for Developing an Environmental Policy:1. Develop a policy that reflects perspectives of various employees within the company (for example, line worker, owner, wastewater treatment operator, quality inspector, compliance/legal manager, production manager).2. Display the policy statement in view of all employees; the policy should be available to the public and customers if requested and be printed in languages other than English, as appropriate.3. Include top management signatures on the policy to demonstrate understanding and commitment.Purpose This procedure is used to develop and write the company’s environmental policy.
Step 1 The environmental manager will form a policy development team responsible for developing and writing the environmental policy. The policy will address, at a minimum, compliance, pollution prevention, and continuous improvement.
Step 2 The policy development team will review other relevant documents to ensure consistency with other company policies and guide the content and phrasing of the policy. Example documents include the company mission statement and the example environmental policies included in this EMS element.
Step 3 The policy will be displayed in view of all employees and introduced to new employees; the policy will be available in languages other than English, as appropriate, and to the public (on request) and customers (as appropriate).Step 4 The environmental manager will review the environmental policy at least annually, and update it if needed.
Responsible Person: _____________________________________Signature and Date: ______________________________________
Environmental Policy Example 1
It is the policy of COMPANY NAME to conduct its operations in a manner that is environmentally responsible and befitting a good corporate neighbor and citizen.In accordance with this policy, COMPANY NAME complies with all environmental laws and manages all phases of its business in a manner that minimizes the impact of its operations on the environment.To further this policy, COMPANY NAME shall:1. Include environmental requirements in planning and design activities2. Comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations3. Eliminate, or reduce to the maximum practical extent, the release of contaminants into the environment, first through pollution prevention (material substitution and source reduction), then recycling, and finally through treatment and control technologies4. Effectively communicate with company employees, suppliers, regulators, and customers, as well as the surrounding community, regarding the environmental impact of company operations5. Periodically review and demonstrate continuous improvement in the company’s environmental management system
SIGNATURE___________________
Responsible Person______________________
Environmental Policy Sample 2
Effective Date
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
_________________________ IS COMMITTED TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT FOR OUR EMPLOYEES, NEIGHBORS, AND FAMILIES.
WE WILL MEET AND OR EXCEED LAWFUL COMPLIANCE THROUGH POLLUTION PREVENTION PRACTICES AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.
TO IMPLEMENT THIS POLICY WE WILL CREATE AN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY GOALS, SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENTS AND SAMPLING METHODS.TO SUPPLEMENT THIS POLICY WE WILL INCORPORATE SOURCE REDUCTION THROUGH REUSE, RECYCLING, MATERIAL SUBSTITUTION, NEW AND IMPROVED TECHNOLOGIES, CREATIVE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL PRACTICES.
TO MAINTAIN THIS POLICY WE WILL PERFORM MANAGEMENT REVIEW, REVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE, EMPLOYEE TRAINING, AND A COMMITMENT AND INVOLVEMENT FROM OUR EMPLOYEES AND MANAGEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS POLICY.

ISO 14001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND IMPACTS

ISO 14001 Environmental Aspects And Impacts
The fundamental purpose of the EMS is to control and reduce the environmental impacts of your facility’s processes and products. For this reason, a critical element of the EMS involves identifying and prioritizing the environmental aspects and impacts associated with your facility. An environmental aspect is an element of an organizations activities, products, or services that can interact with the environment. For example, chrome plating is a metal finishing activity and an associated aspect is chrome air emissions.This aspect may have an impact on the environment in several ways, for example, ambient air quality degradation.The environmental aspects and impacts of your metal finishing operations can be identified, prioritized, and documented in several ways. This Template includes two approaches, either of which can be used during EMS implementation. Use the approach that works best for your circumstances. This process is important because high-priority environmental aspects and impacts will be considered when environmental objectives and targets are established.
Aspects and Impacts Form A — The first approach uses the experience and judgment ofemployees familiar with facility processes to identify the top five environmental issuescurrently facing the facility. These issues and their specific aspects and impacts shouldbe summarized using Aspects and Impacts Form A.
Aspects and Impacts Form B — The second approach uses detailed, structured matricesto list and prioritize environmental aspects and impacts according to the followingcategories:• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Wastewater• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Air Emissions• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Hazardous and Solid Waste• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Raw Materials• Environmental Aspects and Impacts: Water and Energy
The matrices that comprise Form B will help facility staff identify and document environmental aspects and impacts. The matrices also provide criteria for prioritizing environmental aspects and impacts; this process is important because high-priority environmental aspects and impacts will be considered when environmental objectives and targets are established. One possible way to prioritize environmental aspects and impacts using Form B is described as follows:Step 1:For each aspect and impact, score each prioritization criterion on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates the criterion is very important or relevant to that aspect (for example, the aspect is strictly regulated, is the subject of compliance violations, or is a waste generated in large uantities), and 5 indicates the criterion is relatively unimportant or irrelevant to that aspect (for example, the aspect is an unregulated waste, is generated infrequently, and is inexpensive to manage).Step 2:Add the scores of all criteria for each aspect and write the total in the right-most column of the form.This number indicates the relative priority of the aspect compared to other aspects and impacts in the same category. The lower the total score, the higher the priority.Purpose Of This procedure is used to identify, document, and update the environmental aspects and impacts of facility processes and operations.
Step 1 The environmental manager and other facility personnel selected by the environmental manager are responsible for identifying and prioritizing the environmental aspects and impacts of facility operations during EMS planning and development.Environmental aspects are characteristics of facility processes and products that interact with the environment. Only environmental aspects the company can control or influence will be considered. Environmental impacts are the effects of an organization’s activitie , products or services on the environment.
Step 2 Environmental aspects and impacts will be documented and prioritized.Environmental aspects and impacts will be associated with the following categories:• Wastewater• Air emissions• Hazardous and solid waste• Raw materials• Water and energyHigh-priority environmental aspects and impacts will be considered when environmentalobjectives and targets are set.
Step 3 The environmental manager and other facility personnel will review and updatethe environmental aspects and impacts documentation annually.
Step 4 Environmental aspects and impacts documentation will be retained at the facilityfor at least 2 years.
Responsible Person: _____________________________________Signature and Date: ______________________________________

Summaries of changes to ISO 14001

Summaries of changes to ISO 14001
ISO 14001 year 2004 changes are consider having some effect on EMS ISO 14001, the changes require reviewing the EMS and taking action for transition (information is under control of TC 207). Considering the most relevant changes in advancing / transition to ISO 14001 2004 standard includes (an overview for transition / implementation):
Clause 4.1, Scope – requires defining the scope of the EMS (environmental management system) linking to the organizations activities, products, and services (and processes). First consider defining the scope of the EMS within the “boundaries” of products, services, activities, and processes as these relate [for ISO 9001:2000 organizations consider requirement 4.1, and organizations implementing ISO 14001 may be helpful reading ISO 9001:2000 clause 4.1]. The previous indicates an overview on how the EMS fulfills ISO 14001 2004 [some thoughts are internal auditing, management system review providing that these link].
Clause 4.2, Policy – The scope of the EMS and its policy must be consistent. The requirements for the policy remains about the same, now explicitly indicating that must be developed by top management, and other explicit terms in tune with the 1996 version.
Clause 4.3.1, Environmental Aspects Identification – Changes involve in assisting to clarifying statements from 1996 version and the change of the “or” for “and” (within the scope of the EMS); “… products and services…” Control and influence are now mutually exclusive, whilst introducing planned and new developments… new and modified activities… Considering identifying significant aspects must occur from development, implementation, and maintaining the EMS (see 4.1). Information on environmental aspects needs be in documentation format.
To a more assertive statement, “… over which it can be expected to have…” changes to the following “…those which it can influence.”
Clause 4.3.2, Legal and Other Requirements – The wording changes to “legal” in better addressing context to different world regions. Consideration must be given with changes to clause 4.1, for development, implementation, and maintaining the EMS.
Clause 4.3.3 – No significant change.
Clause 4.3.4 – No significant change.
Clause 4.4.1 , Resources, Roles, Responsibility and Authority, please note that this is a new title. This title reflects the importance and relevancy of each term to the EMS. Some minor wording changes include from “…provide…” to “…ensure the availability…” Do not forget that this will require reviewing auditing, planning, and responding to emergencies.
Clause 4.4.2, Competence, Training and Awareness – Whilst using the same
terms in the title notice the change in sequence. This change reflects the expected order of importance of the terms-subjects. Also consider that introduces a new phrase that broadens the individuals within an EMS; “…persons working for, or on behalf of …” Combining these previous two sentences, provides for the organization to include not only relevancy to significant environmental aspects but as well extending to those working for or in behalf of the organization . (Note: also consider that training provider and supporting services are inclusive to 4.4.6).
Clause 4.4.3, Communication – In specifically addressing the European Requirements (EMAR / EMAS), if the organization decides communicating externally the environmental aspects (environmental performance), ISO 14001:2004 address this issue. This is strictly on a volunteer globally, realizing that within the European Union is require.
Clause 4.4.4, Environmental Management System Documentation – in pursuit
of continuing compatibility with ISO 9001:2000 the term applied is “Documentation.”
Thereof, consider this clause also in the light of ISO 9001:2000 when integrating
EMS and QMS. The EMS documentation and records must be those to ascertain
objective evidence on the effectiveness of implementing the policy, planning, and
execution (including improving), control of operations, verification, and control,
improving, and reviewing the EMS.
Clause 4.4.5, Document Control – Again, changing the title and wording reflects
compatibility with ISO 9001:2000. Other than compatibility between QMS ISO
9001:2000 and EMS ISO 14001:2004 there are no significant changes.
4.4.6, Operational Control – No significant change.
4.4.7, Emergency Preparedness and Response – The structure changes by
placing some of its already content in bullets to emphasize each as pointer for the organization to address.
4.5.1, Monitoring and Measurement – Best to see new clause 4.5.2.
4.5.2, Evaluation of Legal Compliance – This is a new clause
[Note: addressing the concern of many government entities / authorities on
their responsibility on environmental and social issues and EMS ISO 14001 1996].
This is construe as the most impacting change to ISO 14001 2004 – this “new” clause brings the last paragraph of 4.5.1 as a separate clause. This clause brings the importance of periodically reviewing legal requirements / compliance under which the organization ascribes. It implies provision of records to demonstrate that this review occurs. This requires that the EMS be review to address the requirements of this “new” clause.
4.5.3, Non Conformance, Corrective and Preventive Action – Includes clarifications ascertaining that prevention (measures or potential of non conformity)and corrective action are two occurring events (which may be mutually inclusive).
Thereof, “action to eliminate the causes of potential non conformities to prevent their occurrence” can lead to changes in your EMS procedures.
4.5.4, Records – States that organizations need records to demonstrate
implementation of procedures and achieving results. These must demonstrate complying with the EMS (procedures and results). Whilst record retention times are not specifically required, record retention needs being specified (consider legal requirements and contractual agreements such that provide a demonstrable sustainable EMS).
4.5.5, Environmental Management System Audit – Whilst there are no wording changes, auditing must be reviewed in the light and effect of other changes (such as 4.5.1, 4.4.2).
4.6, Management Review – The wording provides (more direct) compatibility with ISO 9001:2000, which includes inputs and outputs for reviewing the EMS. Addition includes reviewing for improving the EMS (from target and not merely objectives).
The advent of ISO 14001:2004 shall not require additional training, unless otherwise the organization decides for a short review presentation or an “IMS” (integrated management systems,” integration of management systems such as ILO-OSH, OSH.MS, OSHAS 18001, ISO 9001 and variants with ISO 14001.) It will require reviewing the EMS by management, (perhaps a gap analysis), acting on any changes, inclusive to auditing against ISO 14001:2004 before transition.

Concept of quality – historical background

Concept Of Quality – Historical Background
The concept of quality as we think of it now first emerged out of the Industrial Revolution. Previously goods had been made from start to finish by the same person or team of people, with handcrafting and tweaking the product to meet ‘quality criteria’. Mass production brought huge teams of people together to work on specific stages of production where one person would not necessarily complete a product from start to finish. In the late 1800s pioneers such as Frederick Winslow Taylor and Henry Ford recognized the limitations of the methods being used in mass production at the time and the subsequent varying quality of output. Taylor established Quality Departments to oversee the quality of production and rectifying of errors, and Ford emphasized standardization of design and component standards to ensure a standard product was produced. Management of quality was the responsibility of the Quality department and was implemented by Inspection of product output to ‘catch’ defects. Application of statistical control came later as a result of World War production methods. Quality management systems are the outgrowth of work done by W. Edwards Deming, a statistician, after whom the Deming Prize for quality is named.
Quality, as a profession and the managerial process associated with the quality function, was introduced during the second-half of the 20th century, and has evolved since then. Over this period, few other disciplines have seen as many changes as the quality profession.
The quality profession grew from simple control, to engineering, to systems engineering. Quality control activities were predominant in the 1940s, 950s, and 1960s. The 1970s were an era of quality engineering and the 1990s saw quality systems as an emerging field. Like medicine, accounting, and engineering, quality has achieved status as a recognized profession.

Five Steps to Implementing ISO 14001:2004

ISO 14001 provides a logical, common-sense approach for
businesses to adopt. To start it is recommended to carry out an
environmental review of the business and the Annex to the Standard
provides guidance on the approach required. The Standard then
requires a management system to be developed that addresses the
key environmental issues that were identified by the review as being
relevant to the business, through a rational programme of control and
continual improvement.
There are five key steps to ISO 14001 EMS implementation, and
subsequent operation which are clearly laid out in just three pages of
text.
The five key steps are:
1. Environmental Policy
2. Planning
3. Implementation and Operation
4. Checking and Corrective Action
5. Management Review
Step 1. Environmental Policy
The company or organisation must write an environmental policy
statement which is relevant to the business activities and approved by
top management. Their full commitment is essential if environmental
management is to work. The ISO 14001 Standard clearly sets out
what to cover in the policy. Often a one page document is sufficient.
Produce a first issue and expect to amend it several times before
assessment and registration as knowledge grows in the company.
Step 2. Planning
Plan what the EMS is to address.
Environmental aspects
First make lists of the environmental aspects (issues) that are relevant
to the business. The environmental review mentioned earlier should
provide most of this information and the Annex to ISO 14001 provides
guidance on the format for doing this.
Consider the inputs, outputs and processes/activities of the business in
relation to;
a) emissions to air
b) releases to water
c) waste management
d) contamination of land
e) use of raw materials and natural resources
f) other local environmental and community issues
Consider both site (direct) and offsite (ie. indirect) aspects that you
control or have influence over (such as suppliers) and in relation to
normal operations, shut-down and start-up conditions and reasonably
foreseeable and emergencies situations.
A simple written procedure is then required to determine which of the
aspects identified are really or probably significant (important) and
training needs, outline the key stages of the project and dates that will
lead to the target achievement).
Gradually apply environmental management programme thinking to
such things as the introduction of new products, new or improved
processes and other key activities of the business. In particular,
ensure existing projects become environmental management projects
where there is a significant environmental impact involved, so that the
EMS becomes company wide. This is a frequent oversight found
during ISO 14001 assessments. The EMS must cover the whole
business – like a net thrown over the whole business and for example
including such things as engineering and maintenance
Step 3. Implementation and Operation
Structure and responsibility
Appoint one or more people, depending on the size of the business, to
have authority and responsibility for implementing and maintaining the
EMS and provide sufficient resources. (It’s worth monitoring costs
carefully and benchmarking these against key consumption figures so
that improvements delivered by the EMS become apparent).
Training, awareness and competence
Implement a procedure to provide environmental training appropriate
to identified needs for management, the general workforce, project
teams and key plant operators. This can have far reaching benefits
on employee motivation. The workforce is usually very supportive of
moves to achieve genuine environmental improvement. Every
company has its share of cynics but even some of these can be won
over with time. Training will vary from a general briefing for the
workforce to detailed environmental auditor training.
Communication
Implement procedures to establish a system of internal and external
communication to receive environmental information and respond to it
and to circulate new information to people that need to know. This will
include: new legislation, information from suppliers, customers and
neighbours and communications both with employees and for
employees about progress with the EMS. This process can often
generate worthwhile ideas from employees themselves for future
environmental improvements.
Environmental management system documentation
The EMS itself needs to be documented with a manual, procedures
and work instructions but keep it brief and simple. The Standard
clearly states where procedures are required. Eleven system
procedures are required to maintain the EMS, plus operating work
instructions but if you already have ISO 9000, this will cover most of six
of the procedures required and a quality system can certainly be
expanded to cover ISO 14001 as well. Cross reference the EMS
manual to other environmental and quality documents to link the EMS
and to integrate it with existing business practices.
Operational control
Implement additional operating procedures (work instructions) to
control the identified significant (important) aspects of production
processes and other activities. Some of these will already exist but
may need a ‘bit of polish’. Don’t forget significant aspects that relate to
goods and services from suppliers and contractors.
Emergency preparedness and response
Implement procedures to address reasonably foreseeable
emergencies and to minimise their impact should they occur. (eg. Fire,
major spillages of hazardous materials, explosion risks etc.)
Step 4. Checking and Corrective Action
Monitoring and measurement
Implement procedures to monitor and measure the progress of
projects against the targets which have been set, the performance of
processes against the written criteria using calibrated equipment (verify
monitoring records) and regularly check (audit) the company’s
compliance with legislation that has been identified as relevant to your
business. The most effective way of doing this is through regular
progress meetings.
Nonconformance and corrective and preventive action
Implement procedures to enable appropriate corrective and
subsequent preventive action to be taken where breaches of the EMS
occur (eg. process control problems, delays in project process, noncompliance
with legislation, incidents etc.).
Records
Implement procedures to keep records generated by the
environmental management system. The Annex to the Standard
suggests those that are likely to be required.
Environmental management system audit
Implement a procedure to carry out audits of each part of the EMS and
company activities and operations to verify both compliance with the
EMS and with ISO 14001. Audit results must be reported to top
management . A typical audit cycle is one year but more critical
activities will require auditing more frequently.
Step 5. Management Review
At regular intervals (typically annual), top management must conduct
through meetings and record minutes of a review of the EMS, to
determine that it is still appropriate and effective or to make changes
where necessary. Top management will need to consider audit
results, project progress, changing circumstances and the requirement
of ISO 14001 for continual improvement, through setting and achieving
further environmental targets.

ISO 9001:2008 Requirements – QMS

ISO 9001:2008 Requirements – Quality Management System
Establish, document, implement, and maintain a quality management system. Continually improve its effectiveness in accordance with ISO 9001 requirements. Implement the system to:? Determine processes needed for the quality management system (and their application throughout the organization)? Determine process sequence and interaction? Determine criteria and methods for process operation and control? Ensure resources and supporting information are available? Monitor, measure where applicable, and analyze these processes? Implement actions to achieve planned results and continual process improvementManage these processes in accordance with ISO 9001 requirements. Define the type and extent of control applied to any outsourced processes that affect product conformity to requirements.NOTE 1: Processes needed for the quality management system include the processes for management activities (see 5), provision of resources (see 6), product realization (see 7), and measurement, analysis, and improvement (see 8).NOTE 2: An outsourced process is a process the organization needs for its quality management system, and which the organization chooses to have performed by an external party.NOTE 3: Ensuring control over outsourced processes does not absolve your organization of the responsibility to conform to all customer, statutory, and regulatory requirements. The type and extent of control applied to an outsourced process can be influenced by factors such as:? Potential impact of the outsourced process on your organization’s capability to provide product that conforms to requirements? Degree to which the control for the process is shared? Capability of achieving the necessary control through the application of 7.4

ISO 9001:2008 Requirements – Documentation Requirements

ISO 9001:2008 Requirements – Documentation Requirements
Include in the quality management system documentation:? Documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives? A quality manual? Documented procedures and records required by ISO 9001? Documents and records determined by the organization to be necessary for the effective planning, operation, and control of its processesNOTE 1: Where “documented procedure” appears within the Standard, this means that the procedure is established, documented, implemented, and maintained. A single document may address the requirements for one or more procedures. A requirement for a documented procedure may be covered by more than one document.NOTE 2: The extent of the quality management system documentation can differ from one organization to another due to:? Size of the organization and type of activities? Complexity of processes and their interactions? Competence of personnelNOTE 3: The documentation can be in any form or type of medium.4.2.2 Quality ManualEstablish and maintain a quality manual with:? Scope of the quality management system? Details and justification for any exclusions? Procedures or references to the procedures? Description of interaction between processes4.2.3 Control of DocumentsControl the documents required by the quality management system. Records are a special type of document and must be controlled as required by clause 4.2.4.
Establish a documented procedure to:? Approve documents for adequacy prior to issue? Review, update as necessary, and re-approve documents? Identify the changes and current document revision status? Make relevant documents available at points of use? Ensure the documents remain legible and readily identifiable? Identify external documents and control their distribution? Prevent obsolete documents from unintended use? Apply suitable identification if obsolete documents are retained4.2.4 Control of RecordsEstablish and control records as evidence of conformity to requirements and to demonstrate the effective operation of the quality management system.Establish a documented procedure to define the controls needed for record:? Identification? Storage? Protection? Retrieval? Retention? DispositionKeep records legible, readily identifiable, and retrievable.

ISO 9001:2008 Requirements – Resource Management

ISO 9001:2008 Requirements – Resource Management
6.1 Provision of ResourcesDetermine and provide the resources necessary to:? Implement and maintain the quality management system? Continually improve the effectiveness of the system? Enhance customer satisfaction by meeting customer requirements6.2 Human Resources6.2.1 GeneralEnsure people performing work affecting conformity to product requirements are competent based on the appropriate education, training, skills, and experience.NOTE: Conformity to product requirements can be affected directly, or indirectly, by personnel performing any task within the quality management system.6.2.2 Competence, Training, and AwarenessThe organization must:? Determine the competency needs for personnel? Provide training (or take other actions) to achieve the necessary competence? Evaluate the effectiveness of the actions taken? Inform employees of the relevance and importance of their activities? Ensure they know their contribution to achieving quality objectives? Maintain education, training, skill, and experience records
6.3 InfrastructureDetermine, provide, and maintain the necessary infrastructure to achieve product conformity. Infrastructure includes, as applicable:? Buildings, workspace, and associated utilities? Process equipment (both hardware and software)? Supporting services (such as transport, communication, or information systems)6.4 Work EnvironmentDetermine and manage the work environment needed to achieve product conformity.NOTE: The term “work environment” relates to those conditions under which work is performed, including physical, environmental, and other factors such as noise, temperature, humidity, lighting, or weather.

ISO 9001:2008 FAQ

ISO 9001:2008 FAQ
What Is The ISO 9001: 2008 Standard?
The latest edition of the ISO 9001 standard ISO 9001: 2008, Quality Management Systems – Requirements, was officially published by (ISO) the International Organization for Standardization on November 14, 2008. It is the fourth edition of the ISO 9001 standard since it was first published in 1987.
Who Is Responsible For Revising The standards?
The ISO Technical Committee no.176, Sub-committee no.2 (ISO/TC 176/SC 2) is responsible for the revision process in collaboration with consensus among quality and industry experts nominated by ISO Member bodies, and representing all interested parties.
Does ISO 9001:2008 Have Additional Requirements Beyond ISO 9001:2000 ?
This latest (4th) edition of ISO 9001 contains no new requirements compared to the (3rd) year 2000 edition, which it replaces. What it does is provide clarification to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 based on eight years’ experience of worldwide implementing of the standard and introduces changes intended to improve consistency with the environmental management system standard, ISO 14001:2004.
The clarifications and changes in ISO 9001:2008 represents fine-tuning, rather than a thorough overhaul. It focuses on changes that organizations might make to better comply with the spirit of the standard without adding, deleting, or altering its requirements. The changes are minor in nature and address such issues as the need to clarify, provide greater consistency, resolve perceived ambiguities, and improve compatibility with ISO 14001. The numbering system and the structure of the standard remain unchanged. As a result, the new standard looks much like the old standard.
ISO has grouped the changes incorporated in this ISO 9001:2008 edition into the following categories:- No changes or minimum changes on user documents, including records- No changes or minimum changes to existing QMS processes- No additional training required or minimal training required- No effects on current certifications
In contrast, the 3rd edition, ISO 9001:2000 published in 2000, represented a major overhaul of the standard, including new requirements and a sharpened customer focus, reflecting developments in quality management and experience gained since the publication of the initial version.
Then Why Was It Necessary To Introduce This Revision?All ISO standards – currently more than 17 400 – are periodically reviewed. To ensure that ISO standards are maintained at the state of the art, ISO has a rule requiring them to be periodically reviewed and a decision taken to confirm, withdraw or revise the documents. The review process must be initiated within 3 years of publication of a standard. The review considers several factors such as technological evolution, new methods and materials, new quality and safety requirements, or questions of interpretation and application.
The review of ISO 9001 resulting in the 2008 edition was carried out by subcommittee SC 2 of ISO/TC 176. This subcommittee, which is responsible for the ISO 9000 family, unites expertise from 80 participating countries and 19 international or regional organizations, plus other technical committees.
This review has a number of inputs that help it:
A global user questionnaire/survey
A market Justification Study
Suggestions arising from the ISO/TC 176 interpretation process
Opportunities for increased compatibility with ISO 14001
The need for greater clarity, ease of use, and improved translation
Current trends – keeping up with recent developments in management system practices.
How Does The New ISO 9001 Edition Affect Existing ISO 9001 QMS’s?
As organizations start looking at ISO 9001:2008, they will wonder to what extent the changes might affect them. To a large extent, the new standard will not result in significant change to existing quality management systems (QMS).
ISO/TC 176 was careful in not making change for change sake. In the case of editorial changes, this was especially true. This could have lead to a false impression that there was a change in requirements, carrying greater significance than was intended. In those instances, when the committee members couldn’t come to a consensus in determining if a change added or deleted a requirement, they opted to retain the existing text. They decided it was better to err on the side of caution rather than to contribute to any misunderstanding in the marketplace.
The changes that have been incorporated into this edition of the ISO 9001 standard include changes that should lead to a better understanding across a broader range of product types, including service organizations; use of deliberate wording to minimize the potential for incorrect user interpretation; and reflect nuances of similar concepts. Lastly, some of the changes to specific clauses were made based on the 2004 International User Feedback Survey. This survey was conducted after the publication of ISO 9001:2000 and had invited respondents to identify areas they most wanted to see improved.

Update on ISO 9001:2008

Update on ISO 9001:2008
Following a recent meeting of ISO’s Technical Committee TC176 in Helsinki, Finland, from June
11 – 15t, 2007, publication of the new version of ISO 9001 has been brought forward from 2009
and is now scheduled to be published in October 2008. Experts representing over 70 ISO member
bodies, met to discuss the comments received during circulation of the Committee Draft (”CD”) of
the new standard, and concluded that in view of the very limited changes being proposed, the draft
is now sufficiently mature to progress directly to the DIS (Draft International Standard).
The main changes being introduced into the new standard are as follows:
Clause 0.2 (Process approach)
Text added to emphasize the importance of processes being capable of achieving desired outputs
Clause 1.1 (Scope)
Clarification that “product” also includes intermediate product
Explanation regarding statutory, regulatory and legal requirements
Clause 4.1 (General requirements)
Notes added to explain more about outsourcing
Types of control that may be applied to outsourced processes
Relationship to clause 7.4 (Purchasing)
Clarification that outsourced processes are still responsibility of the organization and must be
included in the quality management system
Clause 4.2.1 (Documentation)
Clarification that QMS documentation also includes records
Documents required by the standard may be combined
ISO 9001 requirements may be covered by more than one documented procedure
Clause 4.2.3 (Document control)
Clarification that only external documents relevant to the QMS need to be controlled
Clause 4.2.4 (Records control)
Editorial changes only (better alignment with ISO 14001)
Clause 5.5.2 (Management rep)
Clarifies that this must be a member of the organization’s own management
Clause 6.2.1 (Human resources)
Clarification that competence requirements are relevant for any personnel who are involved in the
operation of the quality management system
Clause 6.3 (Infrastructure)
Includes information systems as example
Clause 6.4 (Work environment)
Clarifies that this includes conditions under which work is performed and includes, for example
physical, environmental and other factors such as noise, temperature, humidity, lighting, or weather
Clause 7.2.1 (Customer related processes)
Clarifies that post-delivery activities may include:
- Actions under warranty provisions
- Contractual obligations such as maintenance services
- Supplementary services such as recycling or final disposal
Clause 7.3.1 (Design & development planning)
Clarifies that design and development review, verification and validation have distinct purposes
These may be conducted and recorded separately or in any combination as suitable for the product
and the organization
Clause 7.3.3(Design & development outputs)
Clarifies that information needed for production and service provision includes preservation of the product
Clause 7.5.4 (Customer property)
Explains that both intellectual property and personal data should be considered as customer property
Clause 7.6 (Now retitled Control of Monitoring and Measuring equipment)
Explanatory notes added regarding the use of computer software: “Confirmation of the ability of computer software to satisfy the intended application would typically include its verification and configuration management to maintain its suitability for use.”
Clause 8.2.1 (Customer satisfaction)
Note added to explain that monitoring of customer perception may include input from sources such as customer satisfaction surveys, customer data on delivered product quality, user opinion surveys, lost business analysis, compliments, and dealer reports
Clause 8.2.3 (Monitoring / Measurement of process)
Note added to clarify that when deciding on appropriate methods, the organization should consider impact on the conformity to product requirements and on the effectiveness of the quality management system.

Validity of certifications to ISO 9001:2000

One year after the publication of ISO 9001:2008 all accredited certifications issued (new certifications or re-certifications) shall be to ISO 9001:2008.Twenty four months after publication by ISO of ISO 9001:2008, any existingcertification issued to ISO 9001:2000 shall not be valid.
Organisations that are already certified to ISO 9001:2000 should contacttheir certification/registration bodies (CB/RB) to agree a programme for analysing the clarifications in ISO 9001:2008 in relation to their individual quality management systems and for upgrading their certificates.Certified organizations should bear in mind that ISO 9001:2000 certificateshave the same status as new ISO 9001:2008 certificates during the co-existence period. (i.e. Your current ISO 9001:2000 certificate will be valid up to 13th November 2010).Organizations in the process of certification to ISO 9001:2000 should change to using ISO 9001:2008 and apply for certification to it.New users should start by using ISO 9001:2008.

ISO 9001 Standards Software

ISO 9001 Standards Software
Companies that need quality management systems realize that products like ISO 9001 software are important tools to insure their product safety, consistency and profitability. Using ISO 9001 software can help guarantee that any company can monitor productivity, customer satisfaction and product quality with reports that contain solid information.
This information is now vital to management in order for maximum efficiency in any industry. This is why ISO 9001 software is vital to any sized company. Continuous improvement means continuous profitability. Here are just a few reasons why:
o Companies increase sales because of better performance, quality, and delivery. This propels you ahead of your competition.
o ISO 9001 software helps retain employees and attract more highly qualified employees because they are assured of a controlled and consistent work environment.
o The experience of a more professional workplace boosts employee morale.
o Reduced operating costs dramatically increase your company’s productivity, leading to higher profitability.
o Customer satisfaction and higher profitability expand your market share and demand for your consistently higher product quality.
o When you’re compliant or certified to the appropriate standard, the businesses that work with you know that quality objectives, continuous improvement, and customer satisfaction are your goals.
Many companies require that their suppliers are ISO 9001 compliant; therefore, once you’re certified, your opportunities increase. ISO 9001 software has be utilized and has developed experience of helping manufacturing, service, and distribution organizations to be more efficient and more profitable through continuous improvement programs. We help you to implement the time-tested methods of continuous improvement to measure performance, analyze data, and apply the appropriate process changes. This includes using ISO 9001 software.
ISO 9001 software also offers a suite of modules to enable you to manage the document management and ISO 9001 Compliance Management process. These modules enable complete transparent system measurement with targeted action items ensuring all persons are notified of tasks and carry them out in a prompt and efficient manner. ISO 9001 software provides training in there software and also bring extensive experience in implementing the ISO 9001 software in various environments.

ISO 14001 And The Environment

The ISO 14000 family of International Standards on environmental management is a relative newcomer to ISO’s portfolio – but enviroment-related standardization is far from being a new departure for ISO.
In fact, ISO has two-pronged approach to meeting the needs of business, industry, governments, non-governmental organizations and consumers in the field of the environment.
On the one hand, it offers a wideranging portfolio of standardized sampling, testing and analytical methods to deal with specific environmental challenges. It has developed more than 350 International Standards (out of a total morethan 12000) for the monitoring of such aspects as the quality of air, water and soil. These standards are means of providing business and government with scientifically valid data on the environmental effects of economic activity.
They also serve in a number of countries as the technical basis for environmental regulations.
ISO is leading a strategic approach by developing environmental management system standards that can be implemented in any type of organization in either public or private sectors (companies, administration, public utilities). To spearhead this strategic approach, ISO establish a new technical commitee, ISO /TC 207, Environmental management, in
1993. This followed ISO’s successful pioneering experience in management system standardization with the ISO 9000 series for quality management.
ISO’s direct involvement in environmental management stemmed from an intensive consultation process, carried out within the framework of a Strategic Advisory Group on Environment (SAGE),set up in 1991, in which 20 countrie, 11 international organizations and more than 100 environmental experts participated in defining the basic requirements of a new approach to environment-related standards.
This pioneering work was consolidated with ISO’s commitment to support the objective of “sustainable development” dicussed at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.
Today, delegations of business and government experts from 55 countries have participate actively within TC 207,
and another 16 countries have observer status. These delegations are chosen by the national standars institute concerned and they are required to bring to TC 207 a national consensus on issue being addressed by the commitee.
This national consensus is derived from a process of consultation with interested parties.
From its beginning, it was recognized that ISO/TC 207 should have close cooperation with ISO/TC 176, Quality management and quality assurance, in the areas of management systems, auditing and related terminology. Active efforts are under way to ensure compatibility of ISO environmental management and quality management standards, for the benefit of all organizations wishing to implement them.

ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 in plain language

Both “ISO 9000” and “ISO 14000” are actually families of standards which are referred to under these generic titles for convenience. Both families consist of standards and guidelines relating to management systems, and related supporting standards on terminology and specific tools, such as auditing (the process of checking that the management systemconforms to the standard).
ISO 9000 is primarily concerned with “quality management“. In the everyday context, like “beauty”, everyone may have his or her idea of what “quality” is. But, in the ISO 9000 context, the standardized definition of quality refers to all those features of a product (or service) which are required by the customer. “Quality management” means what the organization does to ensure that its products or services satisfy the customer’s quality requirements and comply with any regulationsapplicable to those products or services.
ISO 14000 is primarily concerned with “environmental management”. In plain language, this means what the organization does to minimize harmful effects on the environment caused by its activities.
In addition, both ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 require organizations that implement them to improve their performance continually in, respectively, quality and environmental management.
Both ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 concern the way an organization goes about its work, and not directly the result of this work. In other words, they both concern processes, and not products – at least, not directly. Nevertheless, the way in which the organization manages its processes is obviously going to affect its final product.
In the case of ISO 9000, the efficient and effective management of processes is, for example, going to affect whether or not everything has been done to ensure that the product satisfies the customer’s quality requirements. In the case of ISO 14000, the efficient and effective management of processes is going to affect whether or not everything has been done to ensure a product will have the least harmful impact on the environment, at any stage in its life cycle, either by pollution, or by depleting natural resources.
However, neither ISO 9000 nor ISO 14000 are product standards. The management system standards in these families state requirements for what the organization must do to manage processes influencing quality (ISO 9000) or the processes influencing the impact of the organization’s activities on the environment (ISO 14000). In both cases, the philosophy is that management system requirements are generic. No matter what the organization is or does, if it wants to establish a quality management system or an environmental management system, then such a system has a number of essential features which are spelled out in the relevant ISO 9000 or ISO 14000 standards.